Permutation asymmetry unlocks emergent advantage in randomized Bell tests
AI Breakdown
Get a structured breakdown of this paper — what it's about, the core idea, and key takeaways for the field.
Abstract
All maximally entangled two-qubit states violate local realism with the same probability under uniformly random projective measurements, yet they need not behave identically in randomized Bell tests. We show that when measurement settings are exchanged between the parties in sequential Bell experiments, permutation symmetry of the shared state determines the statistical relation between the two realizations. Permutationally invariant states yield identical nonlocality outcomes in both experiments, whereas asymmetric states can violate local realism in one realization but not in the other. This distinction leads to two operational consequences. First, it enables the detection of correlations between the measurement choices of Alice and Bob through the joint violation statistics. Second, in Bell tests with finite measurement pools, asymmetric maximally entangled states can significantly increase the probability of observing nonlocality without requiring additional resources. Our results identify permutation asymmetry as a useful feature in randomized Bell experiments and highlight a new role of symmetry in quantum nonlocality.