← Back to papers

Characterization and Comparison of Energy Relaxation in Fluxonium Qubits

Kate Azar, Lamia Ateshian, Mallika T. Randeria, Renée DePencier Piñero, Jeffrey M. Gertler, Junyoung An, Felipe Contipelli, Leon Ding, Michael Gingras, Kevin Grossklaus, Max Hays, Thomas M. Hazard, Junghyun Kim, Bethany M. Niedzielski, Hannah Stickler, Kunal L. Tiwari, Helin Zhang, Jeffrey A. Grover, Jonilyn L. Yoder, Mollie E. Schwartz, William D. Oliver, Kyle Serniak·March 24, 2026
Quantum PhysicsMesoscale Physics

AI Breakdown

Get a structured breakdown of this paper — what it's about, the core idea, and key takeaways for the field.

Abstract

Fluxonium superconducting qubits have demonstrated long coherence times and high single- and two-qubit gate fidelities, making them a favorable building block for superconducting quantum processors. We investigate the dominant limitations to fluxonium qubit energy relaxation time $T_1$ using a set of eight planar, aluminum-on-silicon qubits. We find that a circuit-based model for capacitive dielectric loss best captures the frequency dependence of $T_1$, which we analyze within both a two-level and a six-level energy relaxation model. We convert the measured $T_1$ into an effective capacitive quality factor $Q_\mathrm{C}^{\mathrm{eff}}$ to compare qubits on equal footing, accounting for independently estimated contributions from $1/f$ flux noise and radiative loss to the control and readout circuitry. We apply this methodology to compare qubits from two fabrication processes: a baseline process and one that applies a fluorine-based wet treatment prior to Josephson junction deposition. We resolve a small improvement of (13.8 $\pm$ 8.4$)\%$ in the process mean $Q_\mathrm{C}^{\mathrm{eff}}$, indicating that the fluorine treatment may have reduced loss from the metal-substrate interface, but did not address the primary source of loss in these fluxonium qubits.

Related Research