Quantum Brain
← Back to papers

Demonstration of a Logical Architecture Uniting Motion and In-Place Entanglement

Rich Rines, Benjamin Hall, Mariesa H. Teo, Joshua Viszlai, Daniel C. Cole, David Mason, Cameron Barker, Matt J. Bedalov, Matt Blakely, Tobias Bothwell, Caitlin Carnahan, Frederic T. Chong, Samuel Y. Eubanks, Brian Fields, Matthew Gillette, Palash Goiporia, Pranav Gokhale, Garrett T. Hickman, Marin Iliev, Eric B. Jones, Ryan A. Jones, Kevin W. Kuper, Stephanie Lee, Martin T. Lichtman, Kevin Loeffler, Nate Mackintosh, Farhad Majdeteimouri, Peter T. Mitchell, Thomas W. Noel, Ely Novakoski, Victory Omole, David Owusu-Antwi, Alexander G. Radnaev, Anthony Reiter, Mark Saffman, Bharath Thotakura, Teague Tomesh, Ilya Vinogradov·September 16, 2025
Quantum Physics

AI Breakdown

Get a structured breakdown of this paper — what it's about, the core idea, and key takeaways for the field.

Abstract

We demonstrate a logical neutral atom architecture that integrates atom motion with in-place entanglement to achieve lower overheads than entangling-zone approaches. Using a 114-qubit device, we perform three proof-of-principle logical-qubit experiments. First, we implement a pre-compiled, non-scalable variant of Shor's algorithm, observing improved logical-over-physical performance, including with loss correction and leakage detection, achieving up to a 2x reduction in TVD. Second, we construct constant-depth logical CX ladders; on current hardware these execute with serial entangling operations, yet still yield 2-4x lower error for 8 and 12 logical qubits. Third, we prepare the [[16,4,4]] code and perform single-round decoding with post-processed error correction, achieving 8x improvement on logical vs physical. These results demonstrate how combining motion with in-place entanglement offers lower overhead than entangling-zone approaches.

Related Research

Quantum Intelligence

Ask about quantum research, companies, or market developments.