Quantum Circuit Optimization through Iteratively Pre-Conditioned Gradient Descent
AI Breakdown
Get a structured breakdown of this paper — what it's about, the core idea, and key takeaways for the field.
Abstract
Gate-based quantum algorithms are typically implemented by circuits consisting of many single-qubit and multi-qubit gates operating on a quantum input state, followed by measurements of the output state. For certain quantum subroutines, such as initial state preparation and quantum Fourier transforms, explicit decompositions of the circuit in terms of single-qubit and two-qubit maximally entangling gates may exist. However, they often lead to large-depth circuits that are challenging for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. Additionally, exact decompositions might only exist for some modular quantum circuits. Therefore, it is essential to find gate combinations that approximate these circuits to high fidelity with potentially low depth. Gradient-based optimization has been used to find such approximate decompositions. Still, these traditional optimizers often run into problems of slow convergence requiring many iterations, and performing poorly in the presence of noise, a factor that is especially relevant for NISQ hardware. Here we present iteratively preconditioned gradient descent (IPG) for optimizing quantum circuits and demonstrate performance speedups for state preparation and implementation of quantum algorithmic subroutines. IPG is a noise-resilient, higher-order algorithm that has shown promising gains in convergence speed for classical optimizations, converging locally at a linear rate for convex problems and superlinearly when the solution is unique. Specifically, we show an improvement in fidelity by a factor of 104 for preparing a 4-qubit W state and a maximally entangled 5-qubit GHZ state with compared to other commonly used classical optimizers tuning the same ansatz. Such faster convergence with promise for noise-resilience could provide advantages for quantum algorithms on NISQ hardware, especially since the cost of running each iteration on a quantum computer is substantially higher than the classical optimizer step.